COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONAL AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES AND TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS OF CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS IN MODERN ROAD CONSTRUCTION
Inomjon Gulomovich
Professor, Jizzakh Polytechnic Institute, Department of Road Engineering, Jizzakh, Uzbekistan
Anvar Bozarboev
Master’s student, specialty “Automobile Roads and Airfields”, Jizzakh Polytechnic Institute, Jizzakh, Uzbekistan
##semicolon## cement concrete pavement; rigid pavement; Westergaard equation; life-cycle cost; joint deterioration; temperature stress; CRCP; FEA; albedo
सार
In recent decades, the sharp increase in axle loads on highways and the growing impact of extreme climatic conditions have renewed interest in rigid pavement systems. This paper presents a comprehensive technical and economic analysis of cement concrete pavements in comparison with asphalt pavements, with special emphasis on regions exposed to hot summers, cold winters, and rising freight intensity. The study combines comparative engineering analysis, mechanistic interpretation of pavement behavior, simplified mathematical modeling using the Westergaard and Bradbury equations, finite element assessment of critical stress zones, and a 30-year life-cycle cost evaluation. The results show that cement concrete pavements possess a substantially higher elastic modulus, better load-spreading capacity, greater resistance to rutting and temperature-related softening, and lower long-term maintenance demand. Although their initial construction cost remains 1.3–1.5 times higher than that of asphalt pavements, the total cost over 30 years is considerably lower, especially for continuously reinforced concrete pavement systems. The main constraints are high initial investment, strict technological requirements during construction, curing time, and vulnerability of poorly designed joints. The paper also discusses modern engineering solutions, including CRCP, fiber-reinforced concrete, ultra-high-performance concrete, and accelerated curing technologies, as practical instruments for mitigating those limitations. The findings confirm that cement concrete pavements are a strategically rational option for high-category roads, logistics corridors, and freight-intensive highways.
##submission.citations##
[1] Huang, Y. H. Pavement Analysis and Design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.
[2] Highway Research Board. The AASHO Road Test: Report 5, Pavement Research. Special Report 61E. Washington, DC, 1962.
[3] AASHTO. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1993.
[4] Westergaard, H. M. “Stresses in Concrete Pavements Computed by Theoretical Analysis.” Public Roads, 7(2), 1926, pp. 25–35.
[5] Bradbury, R. D. Reinforced Concrete Pavements. Washington, DC: Wire Reinforcement Institute, 1938.
[6] Roesler, J. R., Cervantes, V. G., and Yu, H. T. “Concrete Pavement Design and Analysis: Improved Understanding of CRCP Behavior.” Transportation Research Record, 2007.
[7] Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J. M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
[8] Mindess, S., Young, J. F., and Darwin, D. Concrete. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
[9] ACI Committee 325. Concrete Pavements and Parking Lots. ACI 325.12R. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute, 2002.
[10] PCA. Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. 17th ed. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association, 2021.
[11] FHWA. Concrete Pavement Preservation Guide. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2013.
[12] Tayabji, S. D., and Lim, L. K. Long-Life Concrete Pavements in Europe and Canada. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2007.
Note
This file is formatted in an Elsevier-style research article structure and can be adapted further to the specific Guide for Authors of the target journal.














