A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SEMANTIC AND CONCEPTUAL FEATURES OF THE “RAIN/YOMG’IR” CONCEPT IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Nodirakhon Ashurova

Associate Professor of the Department of "Foreign Languages", “University of Economics and Pedagogy” Andijan, Uzbekistan

Keywords: rain, yomg‘ir, semantic shades, semantic system, conceptual metaphor, cognitive linguistics, linguistic relativism, lexical field, corpus analysis, intensity, connotation, impersonal construction, comparative semantics, metaphorical extension, semantic components.


Abstract

This article examines the semantic shades of meaning of the English lexeme “rain” and the Uzbek lexeme “yomg‘ir” from the perspectives of cognitive linguistics and comparative semantics. The study analyzes their denotational core, intensity-based variants, metaphorical extensions, connotational layers, and syntactic behaviors within a comprehensive linguistic framework. By integrating methods of corpus linguistics, lexical field theory, conceptual metaphor analysis, semantic component analysis, and typological-syntactic comparison, the structural and cognitive nature of the rain/yomg‘ir concept in both languages is systematically explored. The findings demonstrate that English exhibits a highly differentiated meteorological classification system, whereas Uzbek predominantly highlights spiritual, poetic, and symbolic connotations. Furthermore, the metaphorical and semantic structure of the “rain/yomg‘ir” concept is shown to be closely linked to the conceptual worldview of each linguistic community, consistent with the principles of linguistic relativism. The article identifies both culture-specific and universal semantic features of the lexeme and presents theoretical and practical implications for comparative linguistics.


References

1. Pustejovsky, J. The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, 1995.

2.Whorf, B. L. Language, Thought and Reality. MIT Press, 1956.

3.COCA – Corpus of Contemporary American English. www.corpus.byu.edu

Uzbek National Corpus. www.corpus.uz

4.Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

5.Saeed, J. I. Semantics. Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.

6.Forrester, M. Doing Qualitative Research in Language and Linguistics. Routledge, 2010.

7.O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. 5 vols. Tashkent: Uzbekistan National Encyclopedia, 2006.

8.Xudoyberganova, D. Sh. Til va madaniyat munosabatlari. Tashkent: Fan, 2012.

9. Fillmore, C. Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1976.

10. Croft, W., Cruse, D. A. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

11. Evans, V., Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 2006.

13. Ashurova N.R. “Yomg‘ir” konsepti olamning lisoniy manzarasini o‘rganish sifatida (ingliz va o’zbek tillari asosida). Замонавий таълим. №9(154)2025.(5

14.Nodira Ashurova. “Yo‘mg‘ir” (“rain”) konseptining ingliz tilidagi frazeologiya

va paremiologiyada verbalizatsiyasi”. Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika – Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика – Foreign Linguistics and Linguodidactics Issue – 3 № 8 (2025) / ISSN 2181-3701.

15.Ashurova N. INGLIZ FRAZEOLOGIYASIDA “OB-HAVO” KONSEPTOSFERASINING REPREZENTATSIYASI.Oriental Journal of Philology. http://www.supportscience.uz/index.php/ojp/about